Participatory urban transformations in Savamala, Belgrade - capacities and limitations

  • Marija Cvetinović EPFL CODEV, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Tamara Maričić Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Jean-Claude Bolay EPFL CODEV, Lausanne, Switzerland
Keywords: post-socialist cities, social participation, urban development, multi-agent system (MAS), actor-network theory (ANT)

Abstract

This paper analyses the implications of participatory urban design in Belgrade, namely of the series of recent unsolicited activities that has contributed to setting up a specific micro environment in the neighbourhood of Savamala. Its main aim is to promote bottom-up urban development, surpass current profit-oriented trends, and benefit from sociospatial contradictions as opportunities for creativity and participation. The Savamala neighbourhood is among the most important landmarks in Belgrade. Endowed with rich historical heritage and extraordinary spatial potential, Savamala is now a traffic bottleneck with intense pollution, urban noise and socio-spatial conflicts. In order to set up an engine for urban development, several streams of participatory activities have been launched by NGOs and IOs, such as: online campaigns and networking, informal research activities, pop-up events and instant actions for societal progress and bottom-up economic activities. The Actor-network theory (ANT) methodological approach demystifies the circumstances of participation and the role of various actors in building pathways of urban transformations in Savamala, while the Multi-agent system (MAS) proposes the framework for tracing their behaviour at the neighbourhood level. A complex post-socialist framework presents a challenge for these participatory activities to provide opportunities for urban transformations, based on social interest rather than on real estate speculations. In the lack of official strategies and institutionalised support, the MAS-ANT method involves estimating whether an economy of social exchange could contribute to improving the quality of life and functionality of urban systems.

References

Bousquet, F., Le Page, C. (2004) Multi-Agent Simulations and Ecosystem Management: A Review, Ecological Modelling 176 (3–4), pp. 313–32.

Crooks, A. T., Patel, A., Wise, S. (2014) Multi-Agent Systems for Urban Planning. In: Pinto, N. N., Tenedorio, J. A., Antunes, A. P., Cladera, J. R. eds. Technologies for Urban and Spatial Planning. Hershey: IGI Global, pp: 29-56.

Cvetinovic, M., Bolay, J.C., Kucina, I. (2013) An Engine for Bottom-up Urban Development in Action: A Case Study of Savamala Civic District., in ISOCARP conference “Frontiers of planning”, Brisbane, Australia.

Cvetinovic, M., Nedovic-Budic, Z., Bolay, J.C. (2016a) Decoding urban development dynamics through Actor-network methodological approach. EPFL Working Paper, Lausanne: EPFL.

Cvetinovic, M., Nedovic-Budic, Z., Bolay, J.C. (2016b) Examining Post-socialist urbanity by Methodological Cross-pollination. EPFL Working Paper. Lausanne: EPFL.

Grönlund, Bo. (2007) Some Notions on Urbanity, in International Space Syntax Symposium. Vol. 6., http://www.spacesyntaxistanbul.itu.edu.tr/papers/shortpapers/112%20

-%20Gr%C3%B6nlund.pdf, accessed 16th Aug 2016.

Krusche, J., Klaus P., (eds.) (2015) Bureau Savamala Belgrade: Urban Research and Practice in a Fast-Changing Neighborhood. Berlin: Jovis.

Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Lydon, M., (ed.) (2012) Tactical Urbanism, http://streetplansorg/research_and_writing.php, accessed 28th July 2013.

Mitić, A. and Miladinović, V. (2016) Ekskluzivno: Ko stoji iza građanskih pokreta u Srbiji i šta su njihovi stavovi [Exclusive: Who is behind the Civic Movements in Serbia and What are Their Standpoints]. Nedeljnik, http://www.nedeljnik.rs/nedeljnik/portalnews/ekskluzivno-ko-stoji-iza-gradanskih-pokreta-u-srbiji-i-sta-su-njihovi-stavovi/, accessed on 5th Aug 2016.

Müller-Wieferig, M., Herzen, E. (2013) Urban Incubator Belgrade: Report of Programme Year 2013. Belgrade: Goethe Institute.

Petrovic, M. (2009) Cities after Socialism as a Research Issue, http://dspace.cigilibrary.org/jspui/handle/123456789/8490. Accessed on 16th Aug 2016.

Simmie, J. (1989) Self management and town planning in

Yugoslavia. Town planning review 60 (3), pp. 271-286.

“Urban Incubator Belgrade.” (2013), http://www.goethe.de/ins/cs/bel/prj/uic/sav/enindex.htm, accessed 29th July 2016.

Vujošević, M., Zeković S., Maričić T. (2010) Post-Socialist Transition and Empirical Evaluation of the Future Spatial Development of Serbia, WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development 6 (9), pp. 666–676.

Vujović, S., and Petrović M. (2007) Belgrade’s Post-Socialist Urban Evolution: Reflections by the Actors in the Development Process,in The Post-Socialist City, edited by Kiril Stanilov, pp. 361–83. The GeoJournal Library 92. Springer Netherlands, http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-6053-3_18, accessed 16th Aug 2016.

Zeković, S., Maričić, T., Vujošević, M. (2016) Megaprojects as an Instrument of Urban Planning and Development: Example of Belgrade Waterfront Project, in Tech4Dev 2016 UNESCO conference “From Innovation to Social Impact.” Lausanne: EPFL.

Published
2016-12-30
Section
Review Paper