Factors of urban sprawl in Bulgaria
Urban sprawl has become a topical urban issue first in North America and later in Western Europe. It turned into a major challenge to urban sustainability. However, sprawl in Western Europe has displayed many specific features different than that in North America and these features are related to the concrete circumstances in the two continents. The social, economic and urban situation in the new European democracies is also quite different and this inevitably has its impact on the forms of sprawl. One of the main characteristics of sprawl is that it is considered to be market-led. More precisely, a major factor is the lack of balance between market trends and planning policy that allows for the market players to determine the use of their plots in suburban locations with little reference to the public interests and issues of sustainability. As the countries in Eastern and South-eastern Europe have already made certain progress on their way to market society, the problems of sprawl were faced in these countries too. The goal of the paper is to apply widely accepted definitions of sprawl to the processes in the suburbs of Sofia and, thus, to assess whether these are processes of sprawl. It also aims to study the specific traditions and residential preferences of Sofia's population in order to identify specific characteristics and aspects of the Bulgarian model. The findings of the paper confirm that Bulgaria's capital Sofia is experiencing processes of urban sprawl, particularly in its southern suburban areas - in the foot of Vitosha Mountain. Next, these processes display strong regional characteristics. So far sprawl in Bulgaria is less intensive than that in Western Europe but also than that in the post-socialist countries in Central Europe and in Baltic states. Eventually, the urban forms of Bulgarian sprawl tend to be denser and with mix of single-family and multi-family residential types and mix of land uses.
Alonso, W. (1960) A theory of the urban land market, Papers in Regional Science, Volume 6, pp. 149-157.
Alonso, W. (1964) Location and Land Use, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anas, A. (1992) On the Birth and Growth of Cities, Regional Science and Urban Economics 22, pp. 243-258.
Anas, A. and Hyok-Joo, R. (2006) Curbing excess sprawl with congestion tolls and urban boundaries. Regional Science and Urban Economics.
Audirac, I., Shermyen, A.H. and Smith, M.T. (1990) Ideal Urban Form and Visions of the Good Life – Florida’s Growth Management Dilema, Journal of the American Planning Association, 56, 4, pp. 470-482.
Bertaud, Alain (2004) The Spatial Structure of Central and Eastern European Cities: More European than Socialist. In: Winds of Societal Change, International Conference Proceedings, Nedovic-Budic, Z., Tsenkova, S. (eds) Urbana, UIUC.
Breuckner, J. K. (2000) Urban Sprawl – Diagnoses and Remedies, International Regional Science Review 23, 2: 160–171.
Brown, D. and Schafft, K. A. (2002) Population deconcentration in Hungary during the post- socialist transition, Journal of Rural Studies, 18, pp. 233–244.
Cheshire, P. (2009) Urban Land Markets and Policy Failures. In: Geyer, H.S. (ed), International handbook of urban policy, vol. II: issues in the developed world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Chin, N. (2002) Unearthing the roots of urban sprawl: a critical analysis of form, function and methodology. Paper 47, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College, London.
Couch, C., Leontidou, L. and Arnstberg, K.-O. (2007) Introduction: Definitions, Theories and Methods of Comparitive Analysis. In Couch, C., Leontidou, L. and Petschel-Held, G. (eds) Urban sprawl in Europe, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 3-38.
Davis, C. and Schaub, T. (2005) A transboundary study of urban sprawl in the Pacific Coast region of North America: The benefits of multiple measurement methods, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 7, pp.268–283.
Ewing, R., Pendall, R. and Chen, D. (2002), Measuring Sprawl and its Impact. Washington, D.C.: Smart Growth America.
Galster, G., Henson, R., Ratcliffe, M. R., Wolman, H., Coleman, S., and Freihage, J., (2001) Wrestling Sprawl on the Ground: Defining and Measuring an Elusive Concept, Housing Policy Debate, Volume 12.
Ghatak S., Levine P., and Price S. W. (1996), Migration theories and evidence: an assessment, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol.10 (2), pp.159–198.
Gong, H. and Wheeler, J.O. (2002), The Location and Suburbanization of Business and Professional Services in the Atlanta Metropolitan Area, Growth and Change, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp 341-369.
Gottdiener, M. (1977), Planned Sprawl: Private and Public Interests in Suburbia. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
Gottmann, J. and Harper, R., (eds.), (1967), Metropolis on the Move: Geographers Look at Urban Sprawl. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
European Environment Agency, 2006, Urban Sprawl in Europe: The Ignored Challenge, European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
Hall, P. (1997), Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Hirt, S. (2007a) Suburbanizing Sofia: characteristics of post-socialist peri-urban change, Urban Geography, 28(8), pp. 755-780.
Hirt, S. (2007b) The Compact versus the Dispersed City: History of Planning Ideas on Sofia’s Urban Form. Journal of Planning History, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 138-165.
Hirt, S. and Slaev, A. (2002) Traditions and Practices in the Housing Forms and Urban Development in Bulgaria and in the USA – an Attempt for a Comparison - a series of 6 articles, “Architecture” Journal - No 5-6, 2002
Hirt, S. and Kovachev, A. (2006) “The Changing Spatial Structure of Post-socialist Sofia.” In Tsenkova, Sasha and Zorica Nedovic-Budic (eds). The Urban Mosaic of Post-socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy. Chapter 6: 113-130. Heidelberg and New York: Springer & Physica-Verlag.
Knaap, G.J. (2008) The Sprawl of Economics: A Reply to Jan Brueckner. In: Toward a Vision of Land in 2015, Cornia, G.C. and Riddell, J. (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Knaap, G.J. (2012) Is Smart Growth in Maryland a Good Model for State Land Use Reform, paper presented at the Symposium “Rethinking Growth Management”, University of Washington, Seattle, 15.02.12.
Krisjane, Z. and Berzins, M., (2009) Commuting and the deconcentration of the post-socialist urban population: the case of the Rıga agglomeration, Folia Geographica, 14, pp. 56–74.
Krisjane, Z. and Berzins, M., (2012), Post- socialist Urban Trends: New Patterns and Motivations for the Migration in the Suburban Areas of Riga, Latvia, Urban Studies, 49(2) 289–306.
Kovachev, A., 2005, The Green System of Sofia, Urban planning aspects, (in Bulgarian: Zelenata sistema na Sofia, Urbanistichni aspekti) Pensoft, Sofia.
Kovachev, A., 2003, Urban planning, (in Bulgarian: Gradoustroystvo), Pensoft, Sofia
Leontidou, L. (1990), The Mediterranean city in transition – social change and urban development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerman S.R. (1977), Location, housing, automobile ownership, and mode to work: a joint choice model, Transportation Research Board Record, N°610, Washington, DC.
Maričić, T., Petrić, J. (2008) Physical Expansion and Sub-Regional Disparities in the Growing Metropolitan Region of Belgrade, Ethnologia Balkanica, Volume 12, Region, Regional Identity and Regionalism in Southeastern Europe Part 2, pp. 245-265.
McFadden D. (1978), Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. In: A. Karlqvist et al.. (eds), Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, pp. 75-96, Amsterdam
National Statistical Institute, Regional Statistical Office (2009), Sofia in Figures. Sofia, Bulgaria National Statistical Institute (2012), Census 2011, Sofia (Capital). Sofia, Bulgaria.
Nedovic-Budic, Z. and Tsenkova, S. (2006) The Urban Mosaic of Post-socialist Europe in Tsenkova, Sasha and Zorica Nedovic-Budic (eds). The Urban Mosaic of Post-socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy. Chapter 1: 3-21. Heidelberg and New York: Springer & Physica-Verlag.
Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2001) Adjustment of planning practice to the new Eastern and Central European context. Journal of the American Planning Association 67(1):38-52.
Nedovic-Budic, Z., Zekovic, S., Vujosevic, M., 2012, Land Privatization and Management in Serbia – Policy in Limbo, in Slaev, A., Anderson, J. and Hirt, S. Planning and Markets in Conditions of Systematic Transformation: Finding a Balance- a Theme Issue of Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Volume 29, No.4, pp. 306-317.
Nikiforov, I. (1982) Planning of Settlements, “Technika” Publishing House, Sofia
Nikiforov, I. (2008) History of Urban Planning, (in Bulgarian: Istoria na gradoustroystvoto), Publishing House of VFU “Chernorizets Hrabar”, Varna.
Self, P. (1961) Cities in Flood: the Problems of Urban Growth. London: Faber and Faber.
Petrić, J. (2004) Sustainability of the City and its Ecological Footprint, SPATIUM International Review, November 2004, No.11, pp. 48-52,
Petrić, J. (2009) Achieving sustainable urban goals: analysis of urban and suburban residential preferences/ Logrando objetivos urbanos sostenibiles: Análisis de preferencias residenciales urbanas y suburbanas, in Yves Schoonjans et al. (eds.) Readings on sustainability and heritage/ Ensayos sobre sustentabilidad y patrimonio, Brussels/Ghent Belgium: School of Architecture Sint-Lucas & Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: PROURB, pp. 275-301.
Slaev, A. (2007) Bulgarian Policies Towards the Roma Housing Problem and the Roma Squatter Settlements - European Journal of Housing Policy, Volume 7, No1
Slaev, A. (2010), Efficiency Issues of Regional and Urban Planning in Market Conditions, Scientific Almanac of Varna Free University, Varna, Vol. 4/2010, pp 19-73
Slaev, A. (2011), Businesses – the main market player in the development of the recreational areas during the last decade, Scientific Almanac of Varna Free University, Varna, Vol. 5/2011, pp 74-7
Slaev, A. (2012), Market Theory of Urban Planning, Part I - Economics of Urban Development, Publishing House of Varna Free University, Varna.
Slaev, A., Anderson, R.J. and Hirt, S. (2012), (eds): Planning and Markets in Conditions of Systematic Transformation: Finding a Balance - Theme Issue of Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Volume 29, No 4
Song, Y. and Knaap, G.J. (2004) Measuring urban Sprawl, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 70, No. 2
Sýkora, L. and Novák, J. (2007) A city in motion: time–space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and the structuration of the spatial organization of Prague metropolitan area, Geografiska Annaler B, 89(2), pp. 147– 167
Sykora L, (1999), Changes in the internal spatial structure of post-communist Prague
Timár, J. and Váradi, D. (2001) The uneven development of suburbanisation during transi- tion in Hungary, European Urban and Regional Studies, 8, pp. 349–360.
UN (2005) Revision of the UN World Urbanization Prospects report.
Vujošević, M. (2007) The New Generation of European Sustainable Development Documents and Strategic Development Schemes of Serbia and Montenegro. The problem of correspondence, in P. Getimis and G. Kafkalas (eds.), Overcoming Fragmentation in Southeastern Europe: Prospects for Spatial Cohesion, pp. 191-233, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Vujošević, M. (2009) Serbia’s long voyage to Europe. Spatial and environmental planning system and practice and an urge for institutional and organizational adjustments, in P. Palavestra (ed.), Proceedings from the IV Swedish-Serbian Symposium Stockholm- Belgrade. Sustainable Development and the Role of Humanistic Disciplines, pp. 49-59, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Academic Conferences, Volume CXXVI, Belgrade.
Vujošević, M. and Nedović-Budić, Z. (2006) Planning and societal context – The case of Belgrade, Serbia, in S. Tsenkova and Z. Nedović-Budić (eds.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe. Space, Institutions and Policy, pp. 275-294, Physica-Verlag, A Springer Company, New York.
Zeković S. (2008), Evaluation of the current urban land system in Serbia, Spatium International Review, No.17-18, December, 2008., pp.55-60.
Zeković S. (2009), Possibilities for transformation of the urban land management in Serbia, Spatium International Review, No 19, March, 2009., pp.15-19.
Zekovic S. and Hadzic M. (2006), Development and spatial pattern of industry in Serbia, Journal European Spatial Research and Policy,Vol.13 No.2/2006. pp. 161-180.