Operationalizing the public interest in the local planning context of Serbia
Abstract
The concept of the public interest has often been revisited within theoretical debates related to the fields of politics, decision making, and planning. While it has been claimed that the public interest should serve as one of the main pillars for decision-making, various authors reject the possibility of its operationalization, describing it as a vague criterion for any empirical analysis. With that in mind, the main aim of this paper is to present the role of the public interest and its long lasting tradition in Serbian planning practice from socialism until today, as well as its operational dimensions in relation to the specific post-socialist planning context. This paper will first briefly discuss the nature of the public interest concept in relation to planning. It will go on to present some of the socio-economic aspects of Serbian socialist and post-socialist planning practice, so as to better understand the local context in which the public interest is framed. Finally, it will propose the dimensions of planning practice in which the public interest is articulated. The findings were derived from the analysis of the role of the public interest in planning theory, planning practice, and the Serbian legal planning framework.
References
Alexander, E. R. (2000) Rationality revisited: Planning Paradigms in a Post-Postmodernist Perspective, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 19, pp. 242-256.
Alexander, E. R. (2002) The public interest in planning: form legitimation to substantive plan evaluation, Planning theory, Vol. 1, No. 2, November, pp. 226-249.
Basic Regulation on the General Urban Plan in 1949 (“Official Gazette of the FNRJ” no. 78/49) / Osnovna uredba o Generalnom Urbanističkom Planu iz 1949 (“Službeni glasnik FNRJ”, br. 78/49)
Bozeman, B. (2007) Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism, Georgetown: University press.
Campbell, H., Marshall, R. (2002) Utilitarianisms’ bad breath? A Re-Evaluation of the Public Interest Justification for planning, Planning Theory, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 163-187.
Cassinelli, C. W. (1958) Some Reflections on the Concept of the Public Interest, Ethics, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 48-61.
Čaldarević, O. (2012) Urbano planiranje nekad i sad – tranzicijsko društvo i njegov urbanizam, in Svirčić-Gotovac, A. and Zlatar, J. (eds.) Akteri društvenih promjena u prostoru; Transformacija prostora i kvalitete života u Hrvatskoj, Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu, pp. 29-39. [Čaldarević, O. (2012), Urban planning then and now – transitional society and its urbanism, in Svirčić-Gotovac, A. and Zlatar, J. (eds.) Actors of social change in space; Transformation of space and quality of life in Croatia, Zagreb: Institute for social research in Zagreb, pp. 29-39.]
Čolić, R., Mojović, Đ., Petković, M., Čolić, N. (2013) Guide for Participation in Urban Development Planning, Belgrade: AMBERO.
Expropriation Law (“Official Gazette of FNRJ”, no. 28/47) / Zakon o eksproprijaciji (“Službeni glasnik FNRJ”, br. 28/47)
Expropriation Law (“Official Gazette of RS”, no 53/1995) / Zakon o eksproprijaciji (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 53/1995)
Expropriation Law (“Official Gazette of RS”, no. 106/2016) / Zakon o eksproprijaciji (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 106/2016)
Fainstein, S. (1999) Can we make cities we want? in Body- Gendrot, S. and Beauregad, R. (eds.), The Urban Moment. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 249-272.
Fainstein, S., Fainstein, N. (1971) City planning and political values, Urban Affairs Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 341-362.
Ferenčak, M. (2015) Draft text for the purpose of publication “Improvement of Land Management at the Local Level in Serbia”, Study prepared for GIZ/AMBERO-ICON Project “Strengthening of Local Land Management in Serbia”, Belgrade, August 2015.
Forester, J. (1999) The deliberative practitioner, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grubovac, Lj. (2006) Belgrade in Transition: an analysis of illegal building in a post-socialist city. Unpublished PhD Thesis. London: University College London.
Harvey, D. (1996) The right to the city, in LeGates R. T., Stout, F. (eds.) The city reader. London: Routledge.
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning, Shaping Places in Fragmented Society. London: Macmillan Press.
Held, V. (1970) The public interest and individual interests, New York: Basic Books.
Hoch, C. (1994) What Planners do: Power, Politics and Persuasion, Chicago: APA Planners Press.
Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., Stern, M. (2009) Global Public Good, New York: Oxford University Press.
Klosterman, R. E. (1978) Foundations for Normative Planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 37-46.
Klosterman, R. E. (1980) A public interest criterion, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 323-333.
Law on Planning and Construction (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 47/2003) / Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 47/2003)
Law on Planning and Construction (“Official Gazette of the RS”, No. 145/14) / Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 145/14)
Law on Planning and Spatial Development (“Official Gazette of the SRS” No. 19/74) / Zakon o planiranju i prostornom razvoju (“Službeni glasnik SRS”, br. 19/74)
Law on Public Services (“Official Gazette of RS”, No. 83/14) /
Zakon o javnim službama (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 83/14)
Law on Urban and Regional Spatial Planning in 1961 (“Official Gazette of the SRS”, No. 47/61) / Zakon o urbanističkom i regionalnom prostornom planiranju iz 1961 (“Službeni glasnik SRS”, br. 47/61)
Lazarević-Bajec, N. (2009) Rational or collaborative model of urban planning in Serbia: Institutional limitations, Serbian Architectural Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 81-106.
Lefevbre, H. (1978) De l’Etat, Tome IV: les contradictions de l’Etat moderne, Paris: Union Generale d’Editions. [Lefevbre,
H. (1978) About the State, Volume IV: Contradictions of the modern State, Paris: General Union of Editions.]
Lennon, M. (2017) On “the subject” of planning’s public interest, Planning Theory, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 150–168.
Nedović-Budić, Z., Đorđević, D., Dabović, T. (2011) The Mornings after…Serbian Spatial Planning Legislation in Context, European Planning Studies, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 429-455.
Petovar, K. (2003) Naši gradovi izmedju države i građanina, Beograd: Cicero. [Petovar, K. (2003) Our cities between the state and citizen, Belgrade: Cicero.]
Petovar, K., Vujošević, M. (2008) Public interest and public benefit in urban and spatial planning. Sociologija i prostor, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 23-51.
Petovar, K. (2010) The city without citizens – that is how the development was conducted in Belgrade and Serbia, Republika, No. 484-485.
Petovar, K. (2012) Professional associations as actors in making planning decisions about urban space, in Svirčić- Gotovac, A. and Zlatar, J. (eds.) Actors of social change in space; Transformation of space and quality of life in Croatia, Zagreb: Institute for social research in Zagreb, pp. 99-115.
Petrović, M. (2005) Cities after socialism as a research issue, Discussion papers (South East Europe series), DP34. Centre for the Study of Global Governance, London School of economics and political science, London, UK.
Pušić, Lj. (2012) Rasprodaja gradova u Srbiji kao posledica društvenih promena u prostoru, in Gotovac, S. A. and Zlatar, J. (eds.) Akteri društvenih promjena u prostoru; Transformacija prostora i kvalitete života u Hrvatskoj, Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja u Zagrebu, pp. 83-97. [Pušić, Lj. (2012) The sale of the cities in Serbia as a consequence of social change in space, in Svirčić-Gotovac, A. and Zlatar, J. (eds.) Actors of social change in space; Transformation of space and quality of life in Croatia, Zagreb: Institute for social research in Zagreb, pp. 83-97]
Sandercock, L., Dovey, K. (2002) Pleasure, Politics and the “Public Interest”: Melbourne’s Riverscape Revitalization, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 151-164.
Tait, M. (2016) Planning and the public interest: Still a relevant concept for planners? Planning Theory, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 335– 343.
The Constitution from 2006 (“Official Gazette of RS”, No. 98/2006) / Ustav iz 2006 (“Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 98/2006)
Tsenkova, S. (2006) Beyond Transitions: Understanding Urban Change in Post-Socialist Cities, in Tsenkova, S. and Nedović- Budić, Z. (eds.) The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 21-50.
Tsenkova, S., Nedović-Budić, Z. (2006) The urban mosaic of Post- socialist Europe, Liepzig: Physica-Verlag.
Vujošević, M. (2003) Planning in post-socialist political and economic transition, Belgrade: IAUS.
Vujošević, M., Nedović-Budić, Z. (2006) Planning and societal context – The case of Belgrade, Serbia, in Tsenkova, S. and Nedović-Budić, Z. (eds.) The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe. Space, Institutions and Policy, pp. 275-294, New York: Physica-Verlag, A Springer Company.
Vujošević, M., Petovar, K. (2006) Public Interest vs. Strategies of Individual Actors in Urban and Spatial Planning, Sociologija, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 358-382.
Vuksanović-Macura, Z., Macura, V. (2014) Existing models of housing improvement for Roma Social and affordable housing solutions for Roma and vulnerable population in Serbia, Belgrade: OSCE Mission to Serbia.
Zeković, S. (2009) Reform Framework for Urban Land Management in Serbia in the period of Transition, paper presented at World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 30, pp. 840-847.
Žegarac, Z. (1999) Illegal construction in Belgrade and the prospects for urban development planning, Cities, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 365–370.
