Using the ZOPA model to synergize the different interests of local and central authorities in an adaptive city plan towards flood resilience in Surakarta City, Indonesia
Abstract
Surakarta City, a secondary city in Indonesia, has been threatened by floods for many decades due to the overflow of rivers and an inadequate urban drainage system. On top of that, inelastic time-bound city planning has made the city susceptible to ever-increasing flood threats. The local authority has attempted to minimize flood risk through particular structural mitigations of the urban drainage system, which it has authority to do, while the overall responsibility for flood control and river management is under central authority. The different responsibilities of these two different levels of authority have led to gaps and overlaps in relation to the same objects of interest. On one hand, the city authority is concerned with city planning, and on the other hand, the flood control and river management authority is responsible for combatting flooding problems and river management within the watershed. This issue is an interesting point to investigate. In order for Surakarta to become a resilient city, it is imperative to synergize the efforts of these two different levels of authorities. This study aims to find the synergistic and optimal solutions by means of a negotiated planning and management system that involves both authorities. Critical evaluation and assessment of relevant documents, field observations, and measurements, as well as acquiring expert opinions were the main methods used in this study. We propose a ZOPA (Zone of Possible Agreement) model to optimize agreement among the stakeholders. The model essentially highlights the common interests and sets aside the conflicting points among stakeholders. The study found that there are potential points to negotiate with regard to the division of responsibilities through a shared vision of the coordinated institutions and shared planning and management in the direction of synergistic determination.
References
Ahern, J., Cilliers, S., Niemelä, J. (2014). The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 125, pp. 254-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020
Baker, V. R. (1977). Stream-channel response to floods, with examples from central Texas, GSA Bulletin, 88(8), pp. 1057-1071. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1977)88<1057:SRTFWE>2.0.CO;2
Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Bengawan Solo (BBWS-BS) (2017). Studi Masterplan Drainase Utama Kota Surakarta (in Indonesian)/ The Final Report on Surakarta City Urban Drainage.
Brath, A., Montanari, A., Moretti, G. (2006). Assessing the effect on flood frequency of land use change via hydrological simulation (with uncertainty). Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 324, No. 1-4, pp. 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.001
Boogaard, F., Vojinovic, Z., Chen, Y. C., Kluck, J., Lin, T. P. (2017). High resolution decision maps for urban planning: a combined analysis of urban flooding and thermal stress potential in Asia and Europe. International Symposium on Civil and Environmental Engineering 2016, Melaka, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710304012
Bulkeley, H. (2013). Cities and Climate Change. London: Routledge.
Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., Kendall, D. (2006). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 6, 1189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1189
CAC (2018). Chicago Architectural Foundation: 5 Signs a City is adaptive, [online]. http://www.architecture.org/architecturechicago/topics-news/retrofitting-buildings/5-signs-a-city-isadaptive/ [Accessed 7 Sep 2020].
Goldstein, B. E. (Ed.) (2012). Collaborative resilience: Moving through crisis to opportunity. Cambridge: MIT press.
Gornitz, V. (1991). Global coastal hazards from future sea level rise, Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 3, Issue 4, pp. 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-0182(91)90173-O
Hallegatte, S., Ranger, N., Mestre, O., Dumas, P., Corfee-Morlot, J., Herweijer, C., Wood, R. M. (2011). Assessing climate change impacts, sea level rise and storm surge risk in port cities: a case study on Copenhagen, Climatic Change, Vol. 104, No. 1, pp. 113-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9978-3
Halleux, J. M., Marcinczak, S., van der Krabben, E. (2012). The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland, Land Use Policy, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 887-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.008
Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology, GSA Bulletin, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 275-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339501900406
Huong, H. T. L., Pathirana, A. (2013). Urbanization and climate change impacts on future urban flooding in Can Tho city, Vietnam, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 379-394. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-379-2013
Innes, J. E., Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning, Journal of the American planning association, Vol. 65. No. 4, pp. 412-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976071
Jabareen, Y. (2013). Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk, Cities, Vol. 31, pp. 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
Jenks, M. (2000). Achieving sustainable urban form. London: Taylor & Francis.
Jim, C. Y., Lo, A. Y., Byrne, J. A. (2015). Charting the green and climate-adaptive city, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 138, pp. 51-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.007
Khailani, D. K., Perera, R. (2013). Mainstreaming disaster resilience attributes in local development plans for the adaptation to climate change induced flooding: A study based on the local plan of Shah Alam City, Malaysia, Land Use Policy, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 615-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.003
Malone, T. W., Crowston, K. (1990). What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems?, Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1145/99332.99367
Merrey, D. J., Cook, S. E. (2012). Fostering institutional creativity at multiple levels: Towards facilitated institutional bricolage, Water Alternatives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1-19.
Ministry of Public Works and Housing (2015). Rencana Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air Wilayah Sungai Bengawan Solo (in Indonesian)/ Water resources management plan of Bengawan Solo River Basin, [online]. http://sda.pu.go.id/bbwsbengawansolo/portal/index.php/document-category/pola-dan-rencana/ [Accessed: 9 Sep 2020].
Minister of Public Works and Housing (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 20/PRT/M/2016 Tahun 2016 Tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Unit Pelaksana Teknis di Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (in Indonesian)/ Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Housing No. 20/PRT/M/2016 on Organization and Functions of the Implementing Units under the Ministry of Public Works and Housing, [online]. https://jdih.pu.go.id/detail-dokumen/2208/1 [Accessed: 9 Sep 2020].
Municipality of Surakarta (2012). Peraturan Daerah Kota Surakarta No 1 Tahun 2012 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Surakarta Tahun 2011-2031 (in Indonesian)/ Surakarta Government Regulation No. 1/2012 concerning Spatial Planning for 2011-2031, [online]. http://jdih.surakarta.go.id/jdihsolo/proses/produkhukum/file/4806PERDA_NO_1_TAHUN_2012.pdf [Accessed: 9 Sep 2020].
Municipality of Surakarta (2016). Peraturan Daerah Kota Surakarta No 9 Tahun 2016 Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Kota Surakarta Tahun 2016-2021 (in Indonesian)/ Medium-Term Development Plan of Surakarta City for 2016-2021, [online]. http://jdih.surakarta.go.id/jdihsolo/proses/produkhukum/file/6039_PERDA_NO_9_TAHUN_2016.pdf [Accessed: 9 Sep 2020].
NASA (2020). Overview: Weather, Global Warming and Climate Change, [online]. https://climate.nasa.gov/resources/globalwarming-vs-climate-change/ [Accessed: 13 August 2020].
National Disaster Management Agency (2018). Data and information of disaster in Indonesia, [online]. http://bnpb.cloud/dibi/laporan4 [Accessed: 18 Aug 2018].
Nicholls, R. J. (1995). Coastal megacities and climate change. GeoJournal, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00814018
Nicholls, R. J., Cazenave, A. (2010). Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science, Vol. 328, Issue 5985, pp. 1517-1520. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185782
Patton, P. C., Baker, V. R. (1976). Morphometry and floods in small drainage basins subject to diverse hydrogeomorphic controls. Water Resources Research, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 941-952. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i005p00941
Snyder, N. P., Whipple, K. X., Tucker, G. E., Merritts, D. J. (2003). Importance of a stochastic distribution of floods and erosion thresholds in the bedrock river incision problem, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 108 (B2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB001655
Surakarta Statistics Agency (2019). Surakarta in Figures 2019, [online]. https://surakartakota.bps.go.id/publication/2019/08/16/18c08be6770cc96c4497cbec/kota-surakartadalam-angka-2019.html [Accessed: 9 Sep 2020].
Surakarta Disaster Management Agency (2014). Laporan Akhir Monitoring Daerah Rawan Banjir Dan Longsor di Kota Surakarta Tahun 2014 (in Indonesian)/ Final Report of the Monitoring of the impacted area of flood and landslide in Surakarta City in 2014.
Todorovic, P. (1978). Stochastic models of floods. Water Resources Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR014i002p00345
Valinski, N. A., Chandler, D. G. (2015). Infiltration performance of engineered surfaces commonly used for distributed stormwater management, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 160, pp. 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.032
Vandenbussche, L., Edelenbos, J., Eshuis, J. (2017). Pathways of stakeholders’ relations and frames in collaborative planning practices: A framework to analyse relating and framing dynamics. Planning Theory, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 233-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215620150
Verebes, T. (2013). Masterplanning the Adaptive City: Computational Urbanism in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.
Whitehead, M. (2013). Neoliberal Urban Environmentalism and the Adaptive City: Towards a Critical Urban Theory and Climate Change, Urban Studies, Vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 1348-1367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013480965
Wright, P. M., Snell, S. A. (1998). Toward a Unifying Framework for Exploring Fit and Flexibility in Strategic Human Resource Management, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 756-772. https://doi.org/10.2307/259061.
Yin, J., Schlesinger, M. E., Stouffer, R. J. (2009). Model projections of rapid sea-level rise on the northeast coast of the United States, Nature Geoscience, Vol. 2, pp. 262-266. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo462
