Aesthetic communication discourse of urban design for fourth order design in sustainable urban regeneration
Abstract
The research examines several aspects of urban design in order to build on its integrative potential for sustainable urban regeneration. It will discuss the concept and definition of urban design to support the claim that process-oriented urban design can foster creative integration, despite opposing urban development paradigms for fourth-order design. Sustainable urban regeneration will be studied via the perspective of aesthetics in communication as the primary integrative instrument of fourth-order design. The paper presents a theoretical and conceptual overview of numerous integrating elements of urban design. Thus, the process of philosophical and theoretical comparisons is utilized within the disciplines of sustainability, communication, and aesthetics.
References
Bajić-Brković, M. (1992). Predavanja iz urbanističkog i prostornog planiranja. Beograd: Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Baudrillard, J. (2001). O zavođenju. Podgorica: OKTOIH.
Bazik, D. (1996). Problemska orijentacija procesa oblikovanja gradskog prostora. In N. Lazarević-Bajec, M. Ralević (Eds.), Strategija urbanizacije u uslovima neizvesnosti. Beograd: Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, pp. 83-118.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking, Design Issues, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Buchanan, R. (2015). Four Orders of Design. InovaGov [online]. https://redeinovagov.blogspot.com/2015/11/four-ordersof-design-richard-buchanan.html [Accessed: 1 Dec 2022]
Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Derek Lomas, J., Xue, H. (2022). Harmony in Design: A Synthesis of Literature from Classical Philosophy, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation, the Sciences, Economics, and Design, pp. 65-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2022.01.001
Dovey, K. (1999). Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form. New York: Routledge.
Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the Face of Power. London: University of California Press.
Habermas, Ј. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action – Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1988). Filozofski diskurs moderne: Dvanaest predavanja. Zagreb: Globus.
Habermas, J. (2002). Postmetafizičko mišljenje. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.
Hall, P. (2002). Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Harvey, D. (2007). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: MACMILLAN PRESS.
ICOMOS – International Council of Monuments and Sites General Assembly (1972). Resolutions of the International Symposium on the Conservation of Smaller Historic Town. ICOMOS [online]. https://www.icomos.org/en/resources/charters-and-texts/180-articles-en-francais/chartes-etnormes/384-resolutions-of-the-international-symposiumon-the-conservation-of-smaller-historic-towns-at-the-4thicomos-general-assembly [Accessed: 11 Jun 2010]
Kossoff, G. (2015). Holism and the Reconstitution of Everyday Life: a Framework for Transition to a Sustainable Society, Design Philosophy Papers, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 25-38.
Kossoff, G., Irwin, T., Willis, A. M. (2015). Transition Design, Design Philosophy Papers, Vol. 13, pp. 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085681
Kossoff, G. (2019). Cosmopolitan Localism: The Planetary Networking of Everyday Life in Place, Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño y Comunicación, No. 73, pp. 51-66. https://doi.org/10.18682/CDC.VI73.1037.
Landry, C. (2005). The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan.
Lazarević, N. (1988). Grad između empirije i utopije. Beograd: Istraživačko-izdavački centar SSO Srbije.
Lindblom, C. (1959). The Science of “Muddling Through”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 79-88.
Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of Urban Space: An Inquiry into a Socio-spatial Process. Baffins Lane, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Mako, V. (2009). Estetika-arhitektura. Knj.2, Kreativni proces između subjektivnog i opšte-društvenog estetskog značenja. Beograd: Arhitektonski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, ORION ART, Beograd.
Max-Neef, M. (2010). Development and human needs. In A. Lera St. Clair, D. Gasper (Eds.), Development Ethics. London: Routledge, pp. 197-214.
Mrđenović, T. (2011). Urban regeneration of protected ambients in the context of sustainable development ‒ Bač Fortress Suburbium. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu ‒ Arhitektonski fakultet.
Mrđenović, T. (2013). Urban regeneration: Questioning the subject, Technics Technologies Education Management –TTEM, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 1350-1355.
Prendeville, S., Koria, M. (2022). Design Discourses of Transformation, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 65-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2022.01.002
Reeves, D. (2005). Planning for Diversity: Policy and Planning in a World of Difference. New York: Routledge.
Šuvaković, M. (2006). Diskurzivna analiza: prestup i/ili pristupi “diskurzivne analize” filozofije, poetici, estetici, teoriji i studijama umetnosti i kulture. Beograd: Univerzitet umetnosti: Fakultet muzičke umetnosti.
Tošković, D., Petrić, J. (2006). Generating Aspects of Urban Design. In R. Bogdanović (Ed.), Urbani dizajn. Beograd: Društvo urbanista Beograda, pp. 11-22.
UN (1992). Agenda 21. www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21 [Accessed: 1 Dec 2022]
Vujošević, M. (2002). Novije promene u teoriji i praksi planiranja na zapadu i njihove pouke za planiranje u Srbiji/Jugoslaviji. Beograd: Institut za arhitekturu i urbanizam Srbije.
Vujošević, M., Petovar, K. (2006). Javni interes i strategije aktera u urbanističkom i prostornom planiranju, Sociologija, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 357-382. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC0604356V
