Spatial video projection and public open spaces: A distinct bibliometric study approach
In the 21st century, digital technologies have begun to play a more active role in ensuring sustainability. This situation has led to studies examining the interaction between digital technologies and different academic disciplines in many study areas. In terms of spatial planning and design disciplines, this study focuses on spatial video projection (SVP). Through bibliometric analysis, this paper aims to identify and locate an assortment of SVP technologies and contemporary urban public open spaces (POSs) within the global research landscape. Utilizing WOS, Scopus, and the VOSviewer software, a 6-phase process is used to evaluate the current research landscape. The phases include: identifying groups of keywords for cross-examination within the manuscripts; exploring words inside articles with their dominancy levels and linkage clarity through bibliometric analysis; developing a grading technique regarding dominancy levels; grouping graded words into thematic fields; calculating overall values of each of the fields for both databases settings; and comparing the fields for developing discussions and strategies. The findings of this study indicate that architectural disciplines lack SVP-related research. In future academic studies, the approach used in this study could be used to develop topic selection strategies in multidisciplinary settings. In addition, it is expected that SVP will offer potential applications for enhancing the quality of the shared public spatial experience of cities. Thus, this study also forms a cornerstone for further research investigating the potential of utilizing SVP in POSs for the sustainability of cities.
Abd El Gawad, N. S., Al Hagla, K. S., Nassar, D. M. (2019). Place making as an approach to revitalize Neglected Urban Open Spaces (NUOS): A case study on Rod El Farag Flyover in Shoubra, Cairo, Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 967–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.08.011
Angelidou, M., Psaltoglou, A. (2018). Digital social innovation in support of spatial planning. An investigation through nine initiatives in three smart city programmes, Spatium, No. 39, pp. 7-16. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1839007A
Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Proença, D., Jr, Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and Bibliometrix. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, Vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 392–395. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434
Barber, G., Lafluf, M., Amen, F. G., Accuosto, P. (2017). Interactive Projection Mapping in Heritage: The Anglo Case. In G. Çagdas, M. Özkar, L. F. Gül, E. Gürer (Eds.), Future Trajectories of Computation in Design - 17th International Conference, CAAD Futures 2017, Proceedings. Istanbul, pp. 337-348. http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/paper/cf2017_337 [Accessed: 19 Jan 2023].
Brill, M. (1989). Transformation, Nostalgia, and Illusion in Public Life and Public Place. In I. Altman, E. H. Zube (Eds.), Public Places and Spaces - Human Behavior and Environment, Vol. 10, Boston: Springer, pp. 7-29.
Calixte, X., Leclercq, P. (2017). The Interactive Projection Mapping as a Spatial Augmented Reality to Help Collaborative Design: Case Study in Architectural Design. In Y. Luo (Ed.), International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering - CDVE. Cham: Springer, pp. 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66805-5_18
Campos, B. (2012). Book review of Jan Gehl (Spaces between buildings) and (Cities for people) books, Journal of space syntax, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 125-128. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/54778648/104-765-1-PB-libre.pdf?1508606273=&response-content- [Accessed: 19 Jan 2023].
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 62, No. 7, pp. 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
Costa, C. S., Erjavec, I. S. (2019). The Rationale of CyberParks and the Potential of Mediated Public Open Spaces. In C. S. Costa, I. S. Erjavec, T. Kenna, M. Lange, K. Loannidis, G. Maksymiuk, M. Waal (Eds.), CyberParks – The Interface Between People, Places, and Technology New Approaches and Perspectives. Cham: Springer, pp. 3-13.
Empler, T. (2017). Dynamic Urban Projection Mapping. In A. Luigini, D. Basso, S. Brusaporci, E. Cicalò, M. M. Moretti, M. Turco, V. Menchetelli, C. Panciroli, D. Rossi, M. T. Trisciuzzi, D. Villa (Eds.), The International and Interdisciplinary Conference IMMAGINI? - Proceedings. Brixen: MDPI, Vol. 1, No. 923. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/proceedings1090923
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington DC: Island Press.
Hajduk, S. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of publications on city logistics in international scientific literature, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 182, pp. 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.194
Halegoua, G., Polson, E. (2021). Exploring digital placemaking, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 573–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211014828
Halskov, K., Johansen, S. L., Bach, M. (2014). 3-D projection installations—three design strategies for a new medium, Digital Creativity, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.852111
Hočevar, M., Bartol, T. (2021). Cities as places and topics of studies: Mapping research clusters across disciplines, Urbani izziv, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 123-137. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2021-32-01-005
Ivanović-Vojvodić, J., Stupar, A. (2015). Knowledge-based innovation and the city: The case Of Belgrade, Spatium, No. 34, pp. 35-45. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1534035I
Krauth, A. K. (2015). Using Handmade Controllers for Interactive Projection Mapping. The 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia (MM ‘15) – Conference Proceedings. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 717–719. https://doi.org/10.1145/2733373.2808104
Madanipour, A. (2019). Rethinking public space: between rhetoric and reality, Urban Design International, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-019-00087-5
Maniello, D., Cirafici, A., Amoretti, V. (2016). 3D Data and Augmented Reality in Heritage Fruition. A Case History. In P. Argenziano, A. Avella, A. Ciambrone, N. Pisacane, M. Piscitelli (Eds.), World Heritage and Degradation Smart Design, Planning and Technologies - Le Vie dei Mercanti XIV Forum Internazionale di Studi. Napoli: La scuola di Pitagora s.r.l., pp. 1649-1655.
Markscheffel, B., Schröter, F. (2021). Comparison of two science mapping tools based on Software Technical Evaluation and bibliometric case studies, COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2021.1960220
Marsilio, M., Cappellaro, G., Cuccurullo, C. (2011). The Intellectual Structure of Research Into PPPs, Public Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 763-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.539112
Milinković, M. (2016). The bibliometric and citation analyses of the Spatium. Infotheca - Journal. Journal for Digital Humanities, Vol. 16, Vo. 1–2, pp. 72–98, https://doi.org/10.18485/infotheca.2016.16.1_2.4
Moghaddam, B. M. (2014). A Guideline for Virtual Reconstruction of Historical Facades, 3D Projection Mapping Approach. (Master’s thesis, Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimağusa, North Cyprus). http://i-rep.emu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle=1 [Accessed: 19 Jan 2023].
Nofal, E., Stevensa, R., Coomansc, T., Moer, A. V. (2018). Communicating the spatiotemporal transformation of architectural heritage via an in-situ projection mapping installation, Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, Vol. 11, e00083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2018.e00083
Noyons, E. C., Moed, H. F., Van Raan, A. F. (1999). Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping. Scientometrics, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02459614
Ramlee, M., Omar. D., Yunus, R. M., Smadi, Z. (2015). Revitalization of open public spaces: An overview. In M. Y. Abbas, A. F. I. Bajunid, S. K. M. Thani (Eds.), 6th Asian Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies. Tehran: Procedia, Science direct, Vol. 201, pp. 360-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.187
Riether, G. (2016). A Public Space for the Digital Age. In P. Hernández, D. R. Barros, R. M. Iglesias, D. Pimentel, D. Sperling (Eds.), XX Congress of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics. Buenos Aires: Blucher Design Proceedings, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 260-265. http://pdf.blucher.com.br.s3-sa-east-1.amazonaws.com/designproceedings [Accessed: 19 Jan 2023].
Sanaeipoor, S., Emami, K. H. (2020). Smart City: Exploring the Role of Augmented Reality in Placemaking. 4th International Conference on Smart Cities, Internet of Things and Applications. Mashhad: IEEE, pp. 91-98. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=9250204 [Accessed: 19 Jan 2023].
Sherman, R. (2012). Spatial Revitalization: “Recovering” the Public Spaces of Abasto and Puerto Madero in Buenos Aires. (Honors Theses (Bachelor’s), University of Michigan, Michigan, USA). https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/9188hshef?ence=1&isA [Accessed: 19 Jan 2023].
Spandou, M., Garcia, C., Macario, R. (2010). Urban revitalization and Transport: local factors and driving forces from a stakeholders’ view. In P. Pinho, V. Oliveira (Eds.), Bringing City Form Back into Planning, CITTA 3rd Annual Conference On Planning Research – Conference Proceedings. Porto, pp. 615-636. https://citta-conference.fe.up.pt/pdf/conference-books/bringing-city-form-back-into-planning.pdf [Accessed: 19 Jan 2023].
Stefanita, A. (2018). Elements of local autonomy and new technology in urban revitalization process, Central and Eastern European EDem and EGov Days, Vol. 331, pp. 57-68. https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v331.5
Stokes, B., Bar, F. Baumann, K., Caldwell, B., Schrock, A. (2021). Urban furniture in digital placemaking: Adapting a storytelling payphone across Los Angeles, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 711–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856521999181
Tomitsch, M., McArthur, I., Haeusler, M. H., Foth, M. (2015). The Role of Digital Screens in Urban Life: New Opportunities for Placemaking. In M. Foth, T. Ojala, M. Brynskov (Eds.), Citizen’s Right to the Digital City. Singapore: Springer, pp. 37-54.
Tscherteu, G., Tomitsch, M. (2011). Designing Urban Media Environments as Cultural Spaces. Large Displays in Urban Life from Exhibition Halls to Media Facades. Vancouver, Canada: CHI 2011 workshop, May 7, 2011. http://largedisplaysinurbanlife.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/papers/tscherteu.html [Accessed: 20 Jan 2023].
Van Eck, N., J., Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviewer Manual. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden. https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.8.pdf [Accessed: 04 May 2023].
Wiethoff, A., Hussmann, H. (2017). Introduction. In A. Wiethoff, H. Hussmann (Eds.), Media Architecture: Using Information and Media as Construction Material. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 1-2.
Zhou, F., Duh, H. B., Billinghurst, M. (2008). Trends in Augmented Reality Tracking, Interaction and Display: A Review of Ten Years of ISMAR. 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Proceedings. Cambridge: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2008.4637362
Zupic, I., Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629