Pedestrian connectivity: A focus on residential neighbourhood sidewalks to promote accessibility to public parks
Abstract
Public parks play a pivotal role in improving community life in residential neighbourhoods, with many individuals integrating a daily walk to a park near their home as part of their routine. A crucial element of the pedestrian infrastructure that promotes walkability is the use of sidewalks. However, a decline in the usage of both public parks and sidewalks has been reported in residential areas of South Africa due to the challenges discussed in this paper. Studies suggest that ample pedestrian pathways leading to public parks may enhance park usage. This study aims to analyse the functionality of sidewalks in a suburb in Bloemfontein city in South Africa as non-motorised transportation routes and to propose design guidelines for improvement to promote access to public parks in the suburb. The study employs the Conjoint analysis technique to identify factors deterring pedestrians from using sidewalks, thus hindering access to public parks. The results emphasise that the physical layout, and the perceived and actual safety of pedestrians are the primary factors impacting sidewalk usage. For instance, pedestrians frequently opt for roadways over sidewalks despite potential risks, mainly due to insufficient pedestrian-friendly infrastructure. The findings suggest that infrastructure upgrades, connected sidewalks and parks, safety measures, inclusive design, community awareness programs, and periodic reviews of pedestrian needs can lead to cities that promote active lifestyles and become more inclusive, sustainable, and conducive to holistic well-being. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that the Conjoint analysis technique is a powerful tool in urban planning, providing valuable insights into pedestrian preferences and their implications for infrastructure improvement decisions.
References
Albers, P. N., Wright, C., Olwoch, J. (2010). Developing a South African pedestrian environment assessment tool: Tshwane case study, South African Journal of Science, Vol. 106, No. 9, pp. 1-8. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC97075 [Accessed: 17 Jul 2024].
Almansoub, Y., Zhong, M., Raza, A., Safdar, M., Dahou, A., Al-qaness, M. A. A. (2022). Exploring the effects of transportation supply on mixed land-use at the parcel level, Land, Vol. 11, No. 6, 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060797
Bartzokas-Tsiompras, A., Paraskevopoulos, Y., Sfakaki, A., Photis, Y. N. (2021). Addressing street network accessibility inequities for wheelchair users in fifteen European city centers. In E. G. Nathanail, G. Adamos, I. Karakikes (Eds.), Advances in Mobility-as-a-Service Systems. CSUM 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, Cham, pp. 1022–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61075-3_98
Brysiewicz, P. (2001). Pedestrian road traffic collisions in South Africa, Accident and Emergency Nursing, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 194-197. https://doi.org/10.1054/aaen.2001.0261
Das, D., Honiball, J. (2016). Evaluation of accessibility challenges of public parks in residential areas of South African cities: A case study of Bloemfontein City. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Southern African Transport Conference. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, pp. 539-557. http://ir.cut.ac.za/handle/11462/1209 [Accessed: 17 Jul 2024].
Dempsey, N. (2012). Neighbourhood design: Green space and parks. In S. J. Smith (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home. San Diego: Elsevier Ltd, p. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-047163-1.00540-3
Gehl, J. (2020). “Three Types of Outdoor Activities,” “Life Between Buildings,” and “Outdoor Activities and the Quality of Outdoor Space”: from Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space (1987). In R. T. LeGates, F. Stout (Eds.), The City Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 593-602. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869260
Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M. H., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K., Ng, K., Lange, A., Donovan, R. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
Görgün, E. K., Çubukçu, K. M. (2022). Karma arazi kullanımı ve arazi kullanım çeşitliliğinin ölçülmesi (In Turkish), Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 121-137. https://doi.org/10.51800/ecd.1014773
Green, P. E., Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research - Issues and outlook, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1086/208721
Honiball, J. E. (2016). Engineering accessibility of open recreational facilities in urban residential areas of Bloemfontein City, South Africa. (Master’s dissertation, Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa). http://ir.cut.ac.za/handle/11462/1390 [Accessed: 17 Jul 2024].
Jacobs, J. (2020). The uses of sidewalks: Safety. In S. Tiesdell, M. Carmona (Eds.), Urban Design Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 189-194. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080468129
Khanyile, S., Fatti, C. C. (2022). Interrogating park access and equity in Johannesburg, South Africa, Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 10-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478221083891
Krambeck, H. V. (2006). The global walkability index (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States). https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34409 [Accessed: 17 Jul 2024].
Larson, L. R., Jennings, V., Cloutier, S. A. (2016). Public parks and wellbeing in urban areas of the United States, PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, No. 4, e0153211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153211
Lastochkina, O. (2021). Placemaking – An approach for the development of public spaces in modern cities (review of foreign and Russian experience), Society and Security Insights, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 77-85. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2021)2-07
LeGates, R. T., Stout, F., Caves, R. W. (Eds.). (2020). The city reader (7th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429261732
McConnachie, M. M., Shackleton, C. M. (2010). Public green space inequality in small towns in South Africa, Habitat International, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 244-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.09.009
Mehta, V. (2007). Lively streets: Determining environmental characteristics to support social behavior, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x07307947
Mendzina, E., Vugule, K. (2020). Importance and planning of pedestrian streets in urban environment, Landscape Architecture and Art, Vol. 16, pp. 80-86. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2020.16.08
Montgomery, C. (2013). Happy city: Transforming our lives through urban design. United Kingdom: Penguin.
National Association of City Transportation Officials [Online]. (2024). Urban street design guide. National Association of City Transportation Officials [online]. https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/ [Accessed: 6 Jun 2024].
Paraskevopoulos, Y., Tsigdinos, S., Andrakakou, M. (2020). Associating walkability features with pedestrian activity in a central Athens neighborhood, European Journal of Geography, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 157–172. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.y.par.11.4.179.194
Parker, A. (2018). City streets: ‘South Africa should design more pedestrian friendly spaces’. News24 [online]. https://www.news24.com/life/motoring/news/guides_and_lists/city-streets-south-africa-should-design-more-pedestrian-friendly-spaces-20180326 [Accessed: 17 Jul 2024].
Pretorius, H. (2018). Evaluation of pedestrian sidewalk utilisation in residential areas of Bloemfontein City, South Africa. (Master’s dissertation, Central University of Technology, Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa). http://ir.cut.ac.za/handle/11462/2263 [Accessed: 17 Jul 2024].
RealNet Properties. (2024). Universitas area profile. RealNet [online]. https://www.realnet.co.za/area-profiles/bloemfontein/universitas/ [Accessed: 17 Jul 2024].
Sendi, R., Goličnik Marušić, B. (2012). Neighbourhood design: Public spaces. In S. J. Smith (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home. San Diego: Elsevier Ltd, pp. 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-047163-1.00541-5
Stats SA. (2011). Universitas: Sub Place 499023031 from Census 2011. https://census2011.adrianfrith.com/place/499023031 [Accessed: 17 Jul 2024].
Sugiyama, T., Carver, A., Koohsari, M. J., Veitch, J. (2018). Advantages of public green spaces in enhancing population health, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 178, pp. 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.019
Todes, A., Kok, P., Wentzel, M., Van Zyl, J., Cross, C. (2010). Contemporary South African urbanization dynamics, Urban Forum, Vol. 21, pp. 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-010-9094-5
Tong, Y., Bode, N. W. (2022). The principles of pedestrian route choice, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, Vol. 19, No. 190, 20220061. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0061
Uysal, M., Sirgy, M. J., Woo, E., Kim, H. L. (2016). Quality of life (QOL) and well-being research in tourism, Tourism Management, Vol. 53, pp. 244-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.07.013
Wicramasinghe, V., Dissanayake, S. (2017). Evaluation of pedestrians’ sidewalk behavior in developing countries, Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 25, pp. 4072–4082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.327
Wilson, J., Xiao, X. (2023). The economic value of health benefits associated with urban park investment, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 20, No. 6, 4815. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064815
Wood, L., Hooper, P., Foster, S., Bull, F. (2017). Public green spaces and positive mental health: Investigating the relationship between access, quantity, and types of parks and mental wellbeing, Health & Place, Vol. 48, pp. 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.002
