An alternative model of social space: Research on the potential for cohousing in Serbia

Jelena Mitrović; Aleksandra Milošević Pantović

doi:10.2298/SPAT240513012M

Jelena Mitrović Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Union Nikola Tesla University, Belgrade, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-7719
Aleksandra Milošević Pantović Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Union Nikola Tesla University, Belgrade, Serbia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2325-3711

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT240513012M

Keywords: housing, community, interaction, flexibility, open practice

Abstract

This paper explores the social background of the contemporary community housing model (cohousing) whose representation in discursive theory is considered in relation to the crisis of the structural approach to housing issues. On the other hand, this model is investigated as a possible response of collaborative interdisciplinary practices to the volatile trends dictated by the market, aiming to achieve a socially sustainable urban form. In the first part of the paper, the concept of communal habitation is critically examined from the standpoint of the relationship between the private and public, through a comparative analysis of cohousing and residential models sharing similar spatial typology but having differing social profiles. This includes an overview of the broader circumstances related to spatial segregation issues and the aim to eliminate undesirable encounters. The second part of the paper relates to the specific professional and social context in Serbia, stemming from the gap between the mass implementation of socially-owned residential settlements and the interruption of planned urbanization amidst political and transitional crises. The analysis aims to identify problems affecting the largest segment of the population, considering the loss of neighborly connections, spatial stratification, growing social differences, and the deterioration of the housing fund due to construction speculation and the exclusivity of new residential complexes. The study results provide a foundation for the ongoing development of the idea of collaboration for the defense of shared space, forming a basis for investment and superstructure, gradually elevating quality towards socially sustainable urban development.

References

Alfirević, Đ., Simonović Alfirević, S. (2020). Significance of Territoriality in Spatial Organization of Co-living Communities, Arhitektura i urbanizam, No. 50, pp. 7-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/a-u0-25785

Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Caldenby, C., Hagbert, P., Wasshede, C. (2020). The social logic of space: Community and detachment. In P. Hagbert, H. G. Larsen, H. Thörn, C. Wasshede (Eds.), Contemporary Co-housing in Europe: Towards Sustainable Cities? London: Routledge, pp. 175-187.

Caves, R. W. (2005). Encyclopedia of the City. New York: Routledge.

Chiodelli, F., Baglione, V. (2013). Living together privately: for a cautious reading of cohousing, Urban Research & Practice, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 20-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2013.827905

Chiodelli, F. (2015). What is really different between cohousing and gated communities?. European Planning Studies, Vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 2566-2581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1096915

Colantonio, A., Dixon, T. (2011). Urban Regeneration & Social Sustainability: Best practice from European cities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Davis, M. (2006). City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. New York: Verso.

Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces, Diacritics, Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 22-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/464648

Hillier, B., Hanson J. (2005). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jakobsen, P., Larsen, H. G. (2018). An alternative for whom? The evolution and socio-economy of Danish cohousing, Urban Research & Practice, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1465582

Jenks, M., Jones, C. (2010). Issues and Concepts: What is Meant by the Sustainable City?. In M. Jenks, C. Jones (Eds.), Dimensions of the Sustainable City. London: Springer Science + Business Media, pp. 1-20.

Larsen, H. G. (2020). Denmark: Anti-urbanism and segregation. In P. Hagbert, H. G. Larsen, H. Thörn, C. Wasshede (Eds.), Contemporary Co-housing in Europe: Towards Sustainable Cities?. London: Routledge, pp. 23-37.

McCamant, K., Durrett, C. (2011). Creating Cohousing: Building Sustainable Communities. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

Mitrović, J. (2021). Garden of Eden and its Metamorphoses, Phlogiston – Journal of History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, No. 29, pp. 329-360.

Repponen, A., Pereyra, I. (2017). One Shared House 2030: an interactive documentary. One Shared House [online]. https://onesharedhouse.com/ [Accessed: 6 November 2024].

Rizzotti, P., Schneider, P., Wunschel, F. (2010). Southwark Lido / 9 - 13 July 2008. Architecture Foundation [online]. https://architecturefoundation.org.uk/programme/2008/lfa2008/southwark-lido [Accessed: 7 May 2024].

Sennett, R. (1978). The Fall of Public Man: On the Social Psychology of Capitalism. London: Vintage Books.

Siciliano, J. M. (2009). The Process and Issues of Creating a Cohousing Development with Affordable Units in an Affluent Community: Stamford, Connecticut (Master’s thesis, Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts). ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/562b1104-f063-4e9f-86df-4911b6953588/content [Accessed: 7 May 2024].

Sørvoll, J., Bengtsson, B. (2018). Mechanisms of Solidarity in Collaborative Housing – The Case of Co-operative Housing in Denmark 1980–2017, Housing, Theory and Society, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1467341

Vestbro, D. U. (2008). History of cohousing – internationally and in Sweden. Kollektivhus NU [online]. http://www.kollektivhus.nu/pdf/colhisteng08.pdf [Accessed: 7 May 2024].

Vitruvius, M. (1914). The Ten Books on Architecture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wang, J., Hadjri, K. (2017). The Role of Co-housing in Building Sustainable Communities: Case studies from the UK, Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 255-265. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v2i6.946

Wasshede, C. (2020). Doing family in co-housing communities. In P. Hagbert, H. G. Larsen, H. Thörn, C. Wasshede (Eds.), Contemporary Co-housing in Europe: Towards Sustainable Cities?. London: Routledge, pp. 140-152.

Westcombe, M., Rydberg, H. (2010). Children and Youth in Cohousing - Workshop 14. In D. U. Vestbro (Ed.), Living together – Cohousing Ideas and Realities Around the World - Proceedings from the international collaborative housing conference in Stockholm 5-9 May 2020. Stockholm: Universitetsservice US AB, pp. 184-188. http://kollektivhus.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Livingtogetherwebb-1.pdf [Accessed: 12 Dec 2024].

Williams, J. (2005). Designing Neighbourhoods for Social Interaction: The Case of Cohousing, Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 195 – 227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800500086998

Zukin, S. (1995). The Cultures of Cities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.