Evaluation of the capacity development of actors within participatory planning process

  • Ratka Čolić Ambero Consulting, Representative Office Belgrade, on behalf of GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internacionale Zusammenarbeit GmbH), Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: capacity development of actors, participatory planning, mixed method approach


This paper focuses on measuring the capacity development within the participatory planning process of formulation of development strategy. It starts with the discussion of how individual, collaborative and governance capacities became a part of collaborative and consensus planning, and continues with proposing the mixed method approach. Quantitative methods have been used to measure the level of satisfaction/dissatisfaction that participatory approach had on the actors. Evaluation has shown significant increase in actors’ capacities during the planning process. Qualitative methods aim to reach understanding of the actors’ perception of the results of the participatory planning process they were engaged in. Local actors recognized results as the following: opportunity for gaining a new knowledge, understanding of problems, importance of information and cooperation exchange, recognition of ‘others’, capability for evaluation of plans, understanding of different roles and responsibilities, importance of team work and bundling of knowledge from different sources in problem solving, and collective action and interaction. Thus, the participatory planning holds potential as a continual process of developing the capacities of actors.


Argyris, C., Schon D. (1996) Organizational Learning II, Theory, Method and Practice. Reading: Addison- Wesley.

Booher, D.E. & Innes, J.E. (2002) Network Power in Collaborative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, pp. 221-236.

Bryman, A. (2012) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

City of Niš Development Strategy, http:// www.ni.rs/strategija-razvoja.html, accessed 29th Mar 2014.

Čolić, R., Mojović, Đ., Petković, M., Čolić, N. (2013) Guide for Participation in Urban Development Planning, Belgrade: AMBERO Consulting, representative office in Belgrade, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, GIZ Office Serbia.

Čolić, R. (2009) Participacija u strateškom planiranju gradova i razvoj saznanja – primer Strateškog plana razvoja Niša, PhD Thesis, Beograd: Arhitektonski fakultet.

Čolić, R., Babić, D., Mladenović, D., Veljović, V. (2008) Training: Acquiring Skils with SIRP, A Learning Process for All/ Obuka: Sticanje veština kroz SIRP, Proces učenja za sve, in Ramirez, L., Mojović, Đ., Galassi, B., Čolić, R., Vuksanović-Macura, Z. (eds) SIRP Book/ Knjiga o SIRP-u. Beograd: UN-HABITAT SIRP Beograd, pp. 111-125.

Čolić, R., Cvetković, P., Stanković, M. (2008) The Formulation Process Step by Step/ Proces formulacije ''Korak po korak'', in in Ramirez, L., Mojović, Đ., Galassi, B., Čolić, R., Vuksanović- Macura, Z. (eds) SIRP Book/ Knjiga o SIRP-u. Beograd: UN-HABITAT SIRP Beograd, pp. 131-147.

Čolić, R. (2006) Participativno planiranje. Beograd: Zadužbina Andrejević.

Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T. Schram, S. (eds.) (2012) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge University Press.

Forester, J. (2012) Learning to Improve Practice: Lessons from Practice Stories and Practitioners' Own Discourse Analyses (or Why Only the Loons Show Up). Planning Theory & Practice, 13:1. pp. 11-26.

Forester, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Making Participatory Planning Processes Work. Cambridge, MIT Press.

Foster-Fishman, P.G., Berkowitz, S.L., Lounsbury, D.W., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N.A. (2001) Building Collaborative Capacity in Community Coalitions: Review and Integrative Framework. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2) pp. 241-261.

Healey, P. (2007) Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies. London: Routledge.

Healey, P. (2006) Transforming Governance: Challenges of Institutional Adaptation and a New Politics of Space. European Planning Studies, Vol. 14, pp. 299-319.

Healey, P. (2004) The New Institutionalism and the Transformative Goals of Planning, in: Verma, N. (ed.) Institutions and Planning. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 61- 87.

Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning, Shaping Places in Fragmented Society. London: Macmillan Press.

Innes, J.E., Kaplan, L., Connick, S. & Booher, D.E. (2006) Collaborative Governance in the CALFED Program: Adaptive Policy Making for California Water, IURD Working Paper Series. University of California.

Innes, J.E. & Booher, D.E. (2003) The Impact of Collaborative Planning on Governance Capacity. Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning.

Innes, J.E., Booher, D.E. (2000) Indicators for Sustainable Communities: A Strategy Building on Complexity Theory and Distributed Intelligence. Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 1. No.2. pp. 173-186.

Innes, J.E. & Booher, D.E. (1999) Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning, Journal of the American Planning Association 65(4), pp. 412-423.

Johnson, R.B. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004) Mixed Method Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has to Come. Educational Researcher, Vol. 33, No. 7, pp. 14-26.

Margerum, R. D. (2002) Evaluating Collaborative Planning - Implications from an Empirical Analysis of Growth Management, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68 (2) pp. 179-193.

Strategija razvoja grada Niša, http://www.zurbnis.rs/zakoni/Revizija%20strategije%20razvoja%20Grada%20Nisa%20za%20period%202009-2020.pdf, accessed 29th Mar 2014.

UNCHS & UNEP (1999) Measuring Progress: Management Indicators for Environmental Planning and Management (1st Draft), Nairobi: UNCHS.

UNCHS (1999) Participatory Decision-Making Indicators: Measuring Progress on Improving Urban Management Decision Making Processes. Guidelines for Istanbul + 5, Nairobi: UNCHS.

UNCHS (2001) Guidelines for the Evaluation of Post-Disaster Programmes. Disaster Manage- ment Programme, Nairobi: UNCHS.

UNDP (1997) Who are the Question-makers? A Participatory Evaluation Handbook. OESP Handbook Series, New York, NY, Office of Evaluation and Strategic Planning.

UNDP (1998) Capacity Assessment and Development. UNDP, New York.

UN-HABITAT (2004) Urban Indicators Guidelines: Monitoring the Habitat Agenda and the Millennium Development Goals, Nairobi: UN-HABITAT.

UN-HABITAT and the Global Urban Observatory (2002) Urban Governance Indicators: A Sourcebook. First Draft, Nairobi: UN-HABITAT.

Vujošević, M. (2010) Collapse of Strategic Thinking, Research and Governance in Serbia and Possible Role of the Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia (2010) in its Renewal, SPATIUM International Review, No. 23, October 2010, pp. 22-29.

Vujošević, M. (2004) The Search for a New Development Planning/Policy Mode: Problems of Expertise in the Transition Period, SPATIUM International Review, 2004 (10), pp.12-18.

Review Paper - Second Part