Legal pathways for bottom-up project development in Serbia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT251121012MKeywords:
development , bottom-up initiative, legislation, operationalization, SerbiaAbstract
In the context of increasing calls for participatory and community-led development, understanding the extent to which legal frameworks enable bottom-up approaches is crucial. This paper examines the legislative framework governing spatial development in Serbia in order to identify legal possibilities for initiatives coming from nongovernmental actors. The research employs a content analysis of relevant legislative acts, followed by a second layer of analysis that focuses on the planning documents these laws prescribe and their interrelations at the operational level. The findings reveal that, while the legal framework formally allows the engagement of licensed professionals and legal entities, the initiation, financing, and control of development processes remain largely in the hands of state and local authorities. The only significant space for bottom-up development is found within the Law on Agriculture and Rural Development, through the LEADER program, which explicitly encourages community-led initiatives. In contrast, other legal provisions offer limited room for meaningful participation by non-governmental actors, highlighting a top-down orientation in Serbia’s development planning system.
References
Albrechts, L. (2010). More of the same is not enough: How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead?, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 1115-1127. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36068
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Bennett, J. (2025). Co-creative politics: A process approach to left and right. In J. Bennett (Ed.) Reimagining Peace through Process Philosophy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70129-0_5
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications [online]. https://practicalactionpublishing.com/book/2388/whose-reality-counts [Accessed: 20 Nov 2025].
Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices, Community Development Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
Čolić, N., Dželebdžić, O. (2018). Beyond formality: A contribution towards revising the participatory planning practice in Serbia, Spatium, No. 39, pp. 17-25. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1839017C
Escobedo Garcia, N., Ulibarri, N. (2022). Plan writing as a policy tool: Instrumental, conceptual, and tactical uses of water management plans in California, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Vol. 12, pp. 475-489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-022-00754-0
EU Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development (EU MRSPTD) (2020). Territorial Agenda 2030: A future for all places, German Presidency of the Council of the European Union [online]. https://territorialagenda.eu/wp-content/uploads/TA2030_jun2021_en.pdf [Accessed: 02 Feb 2025].
European Commission (EC) (2021a). EU cohesion policy 2021–2027. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission (EC) (2021b). The New European Bauhaus. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission (EC) (2016). Urban Agenda for the EU: Pact of Amsterdam. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union [online]. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/themes/urban-development/agenda/pact-of-amsterdam.pdf [Accessed: 02 Feb 2025].
European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON) (2021). ESPON 2030 Programme, ESPON [online]. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/3159728/espon-2030-programme-consultation-process-on-thematic-action-plans/3957603/ [Accessed: 19 Nov 2025].
European Union (EU) (2020). New Leipzig Charter: The transformative power of cities for the common good. Luxembourg: European Commission [online]. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/brochure/new_leipzig_charter/new_leipzig_charter_en.pdf [Accessed: 02 Feb 2025].
Evans, P. (2002). Political strategies for more livable cities: Lessons from six cases of development and political transition. In P. Evans (Ed.), Livable cities? Urban struggles for livelihood and sustainability. Oakland, California: University of California Press, pp. 222–246.
Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance, Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, No. S1, pp. 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
Fung, A., Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London, New York: Verso.
Gaventa, J. (2004). Towards participatory governance: Assessing the transformative possibilities. In S. Hickey, G. Mohan (Eds.), Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development. London: Zed Books, pp. 25-41.
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan Press.
Huxley, M., Yiftachel, O. (2000). New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 333-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900402
Innes, J. E., Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century, Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170
Kleinhans, R., Falco, E., Babelon, I. (2022). Conditions for networked co-production through digital participatory platforms in urban planning, European Planning Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 769-788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1998387
Lokalna akciona grupa (LAG “Rtanj”) (2020). Lokalna strategija ruralnog razvoja 2020-2030 (in Serbian), Lokalna akciona grupa “Rtanj” [online]. https://sokobanja.ls.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LSRR-LAG-RTANJ.pdf [Accessed: 19 Nov 2025].
Lukić, M. (2021). Stavovi građana i građanki o mogućnostima učešća u procesu prostornog i urbanističkog planiranja u Srbiji. In D. Filipović, V. Šećerov, D. S. Đorđević (Eds.), Zbornik radova Jedanaestog naučno-stručnog skupa sa međunarodnim učešćem “Planska i normativna zaštita prostora i životne sredine”. Beograd: Asocijacija prostornih planera Srbije & Univerzitet u Beogradu - Geografski fakultet, pp. 321–327 [online]. https://gery.gef.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/handle/123456789/1368/bitstream_2963.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Accessed: 19 Nov 2025].
Maksin-Mićić, M., Milijić, S., Nenković-Riznić, M. (2009). Spatial and environmental planning of sustainable regional development in Serbia, Spatium, No. 21, pp. 39-52. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT0921039M
Maričić, T., Cvetinović, M., Bolay, J.-C. (2018). Participatory Planning in Urban Development of Post-Socialist Serbia. In J.-C. Bolay, T. Maričić, S. Zeković (Eds.), A Support to Urban Development Process. Lausanne, Switzerland: École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Cooperation and development center (CODEV) & Belgrade, Serbia: Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia (IAUS), pp. 1-28 [online]. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_raumplan_354 [Accessed: 19 Nov 2025].
Marković, M. (2022). Koliko građani zaista učestvuju u oblikovanju grada?. Gradnja [online]. https://www.gradnja.rs/urbanizam-intervju-planska-praksa-ljubica-slavkovic-dragomir-ristanovic/ [Accessed: 19 Nov 2025].
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede (MPŠV) (2022a). Nacionalni program za poljoprivredu za period 2022–2024. godine – Nacrt, MPŠV [online]. https://www.minpolj.gov.rs/nacionalni-program-za-poljoprivredu-za-period-2022-2024-godine/ [Accessed: 19 Nov 2025].
Ministarstvo poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede (MPŠV) (2022b). Nacionalni program ruralnog razvoja za period 2022–2024. godine – Nacrt, MPŠV [online]. https://www.srbija.gov.rs/vest/663400/nacionalni-program-ruralnog-razvoja-do-2024-godine.php [Accessed: 19 Nov 2025].
Nadin, V., Piskorek, K. I., Balz, V. E., Zonneveld, W. A. M., Munoz Unceta, P. A., Georgieva, N. D., den Hoed, A. W., Hermansons, Z., Daly, G. (Eds.). (2021). Cross-fertilisation of cohesion policy and spatial planning: ESPON Policy Brief. Luxembourg: ESPON [online]. https://pure.tudelft.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/103269184/ESPON_Policy_Brief_Cross_fertilisation_of_cohesion_policy_and_spatial_planning.pdf [Accessed: 19 Nov 2025].
Natan-Krup, D., Mizrahi, S. (2025). Public accountability and auditing: Why and when do state auditors conduct broad audits?, Public Administration, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 166-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13012
Nikolić, D., Pantić, M., Jokić, V. (2021). Urban and Spatial Planning: Pragmatic Considerations for Plan Implementation Improvements (A Case Study of the City of Bor), Sage Open, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021994554
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2021). Decentralisation and Regionalisation in Bulgaria: Towards Balanced Regional Development. OECD Multi-level Governance Studies, OECD Publishing: Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5ab8109-en.
Pantić, M., Cilliers, J., Cimadomo, G., Montaño, F., Olufemi, O., Torres Mallma, S., van den Berg, J. (2021). Challenges and opportunities for public participation in urban and regional planning during the COVID-19 pandemic - Lessons learned for the future, Land, Vol. 10, No. 12, 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121379
Pantić, M., Toković, M., Maričić, T., Milosavljević, D., Vuković, M. (2026). Mining-Scapes of Participation in Serbian Extractive Regions: Enhancing Participatory Processes in Decision-Making, Urban Science, Vol. 10, No. 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10010005
Paraušić, V., Kljajić, N. (2024). Leader Approach and Rural Entrepreneurship for Resilient Rural Areas: Perceptions by the Local Action Groups' Managers in Serbia. In J. V. Andrei, A. Grigorescu (Eds.), Emerging Patterns and Behaviors in a Green Resilient Economy. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-780-720241012
Paraušić, V., Mihailović, B., Božić, D. (2011). Capacity Building of Rural Areas in Serbia through Forming Local Action Groups, Economic of Agriculture, Vol. 58, No. 1, Book 2, pp. 130–136 [online]. https://www.ea.bg.ac.rs/index.php/EA/article/view/758 [Accessed: 21 Nov 2025].
Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pretty, J. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture, World Development, Vol. 23, No. 8, pp. 1247-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rossi, S., Harsia, E., Kajosaari, A., Kyttä, M. (2024). The citizens have participated – what now? An action research study of factors impacting the use of participatory citizen knowledge in planning processes, European Planning Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 124-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2024.2416001
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Shohet Radom, O., Menahem, G., Meydani, A., Hananel, R. (2025). Centralization, local autonomy and municipal activism: A new framework for examining relations between central and local government, Land, Vol. 14, No. 3, 587. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030587
Službeni glasnik RS (br. 41/2009-71, 10/2013-3 (dr. zakon), 101/2016-3, 67/2021-10 (dr. zakon), 114/2021-186, 19/2025-52). Zakon o poljoprivredi i ruralnom razvoju (in Serbian). Belgrade: JP „Službeni glasnik“.
Službeni glasnik RS (br. 72/2009, 81/2009 - ispr., 64/2010 - odluka US, 24/2011, 121/2012, 42/2013 - odluka US, 50/2013 - odluka US, 98/2013 - odluka US, 132/2014, 145/2014, 83/2018, 31/2019, 37/2019 - dr. zakon, 9/2020, 52/2021, 62/2023 i 91/2025). Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji Republike Srbije (in Serbian). Belgrade: JP „Službeni glasnik“.
Službeni glasnik RS (br. 30/2018). Zakon o planskom sistemu Republike Srbije (in Serbian). Belgrade: JP „Službeni glasnik“.
Službeni glasnik RS (br. 51/2009-3, 30/2010-7, 89/2015-3 (dr. zakon)). Zakon o regionalnom razvoju (in Serbian). Belgrade: JP „Službeni glasnik“.
Službeni glasnik RS (br. 17/2015). Program implementacije regionalnog prostornog plana Timočke krajine za period do 2018. godine (in Serbian). Belgrade: JP „Službeni glasnik“.
Službeni glasnik RS (br. 51/2011-3). Regionalni prostorni plan Timočke Krajine (in Serbian). Belgrade: JP „Službeni glasnik“.
Službeni glasnik RS (br. 85/2014-30). Strategija poljoprivrede i ruralnog razvoja za period 2014–2024. godine (in Serbian). Belgrade: JP „Službeni glasnik“.
Službeni list opštine Sokobanja (br. 02-6/23). Srednjeročni plan opštine Sokobanja od 2024. do 2026. (in Serbia). Sokobanja: Opština Sokobanja.
Službeni list opštine Sokobanja (br. 02-104/22). Plan razvoja opštine Sokobanja od 2023. do 2027. (in Serbian). Sokobanja: Opština Sokobanja.
Službeni list opštine Sokobanja (br. 3/18). Prostorni plan opštine Sokobanja (in Serbian). Sokobanja: Opština Sokobanja.
Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design, Technical Communication, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 163–174 [online]. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/0b8436bb-072b-46f3-a052-0e4f2e7b58da/content [Accessed: 21 Nov 2025].
Stefanović, N., Danilović Hristić, N., Milijić, S. (2015). The implementation model of planning rules in spatial plans, Spatium, No. 33, pp. 62–68. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1533062S
Svetikas, K. Ž. (2014). Strategic Planning for Regional Development: An introductory textbook. Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University [online]. https://cris.mruni.eu/server/api/core/bitstreams/44830fa6-2bfb-4903-8b57-6edbb2d55eb3/content [Accessed: 21 Nov 2025].
Tranvik, T., Selle, P. (2022). Chapter 6: More Centralization, Less Democracy: The decline of the Democratic Infrastructure in Norway. In L. Trägårdh (Ed.), State and Civil Society in Northern Europe: The Swedish Model Reconsidered. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781782382003-011
Vujić, D., Čolić, R. and Veljović, V. (2024). Efekti uključivanja različitih aktera u proces planiranja na lokalnom nivou. In B. Lukić, V. Šećerov, D. S. Đorđević, Z. Radosavljević (Eds.), Lokalna samouprava u planiranju i uređenju prostora i naselja. Beograd: Asocijacija prostornih planera Srbije & Univerzitet u Beogradu – Geografski fakultet, pp. 325–330. https://doi.org/10.5937/LSPUPN24325V
Wolf, C. T., Jr. (1993). Markets or governments: Choosing between imperfect alternatives (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Spatium
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
